Understanding ACID and CAP: Database Design Principles

A Comprehensive Guide to Transaction Properties and Distributed Systems

Featured image



Overview

Today, we’ll explore ACID principles and CAP theorem, comparing how these concepts are applied in databases and NoSQL systems.

ACID principles are core concepts in transaction design for maintaining data consistency, while CAP theorem deals with balancing availability and consistency in distributed systems.

Understanding these two concepts helps clarify the criteria for choosing between RDBMS (Relational Database Management Systems) and NoSQL databases.



1️⃣ What are ACID Principles?

ACID represents four fundamental properties of database transactions.

ACID Principle Description Example
A (Atomicity) A transaction must be executed completely or not at all In a bank transfer, money must either be fully transferred from account A to B, or not at all
C (Consistency) Database integrity must be maintained before and after transaction execution Product purchase should fail if inventory is insufficient
I (Isolation) Multiple transactions should not interfere with each other Changes by other users should not affect an ongoing order process
D (Durability) Successfully completed transactions must be permanently stored Order history should not be lost even if system failure occurs

Databases implementing ACID principles: MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, and other RDBMS systems.



2️⃣ What is CAP Theorem?

CAP theorem explains three properties that can be maintained in a distributed system. A system can only guarantee two of these three properties!

CAP Property Description Example
C (Consistency) All nodes must maintain the same latest data Any node accessed should have the most recent data
A (Availability) Every request must receive a response System should return data even if some nodes fail
P (Partition Tolerance) System must continue operating despite network failures Service should not stop even if data center connections are lost


Key Points of CAP Theorem:



3️⃣ CAP Theorem and NoSQL

NoSQL databases are designed based on CAP theorem, requiring trade-offs between Consistency and Availability.

NoSQL Type CAP Model Example Databases
CP (Consistency + Partition Tolerance) Maintains data consistency, sacrifices availability MongoDB, HBase
AP (Availability + Partition Tolerance) Always provides response, may have eventual consistency Cassandra, DynamoDB
CA (Consistency + Availability) Doesn’t allow network partitions (practically impossible) Traditional RDBMS (single node)


RDBMS vs NoSQL Differences:



4️⃣ ACID vs CAP Comparison

Aspect ACID (Transaction Principles) CAP (Distributed Systems Theory)
Purpose Maintain data integrity and consistency Balance data availability and consistency in distributed systems
Application RDBMS (MySQL, PostgreSQL) NoSQL (MongoDB, Cassandra)
Focus Ensure data accuracy & integrity Operate despite network failures
Limitations Potential performance impact (JOINs, LOCKs) Can only choose two of three properties
Use Cases Banking systems, accounting data Large-scale web services, social media



5️⃣ When to Use ACID vs CAP?


ACID Required (RDBMS)


CAP Required (NoSQL)


Mixed Usage (Polyglot Persistence)

Most enterprises use both RDBMS and NoSQL:



Conclusion

ACID and CAP theorem are crucial concepts in database design. The choice of database depends on data characteristics and business requirements.

It’s essential to choose the optimal database design based on data characteristics and system requirements!



References