3 min to read
Understanding Web Rendering Methods - CSR, SSR, SSG, and ISR
A comprehensive comparison of different web rendering approaches
Overview
Web rendering is the process of generating visual content from web code, including HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Let’s explore the four main rendering approaches: CSR, SSR, SSG, and ISR.
Client-Side Rendering (CSR)
Process:
- Browser downloads minimal HTML
- JavaScript loads and executes
- UI renders dynamically
- Handles user interactions
Advantages
- Rich interactivity
- Reduced server load
- Fast subsequent navigation
Disadvantages
- Slow initial load
- Poor SEO performance
- JavaScript dependency
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Browser
participant Server
participant API
User->>Browser: Request Page
Browser->>Server: Load Static HTML/JS
Server-->>Browser: HTML/JS Bundle
Browser->>API: Fetch Data (AJAX/Fetch)
API-->>Browser: JSON Data
Browser->>User: Rendered Content
Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
Process:
- Server processes request
- Generates complete HTML
- Sends rendered page
- Browser displays content
Advantages
- Fast initial page load
- SEO friendly
- Consistent performance
Disadvantages
- Higher server load
- Slower page transitions
- More server resources needed
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Browser
participant Server
participant Database
User->>Browser: Request Page
Browser->>Server: Request HTML
Server->>Database: Fetch Data
Database-->>Server: Return Data
Server->>Browser: Rendered HTML
Browser->>User: Display Page
Static Site Generation (SSG)
Process:
- Pages built at build time
- Pre-renders all HTML/CSS/JS
- Serves via CDN
- Instant page loads
Advantages
- Extremely fast loading
- Great SEO
- Highly scalable
- Low server costs
Disadvantages
- Long build times
- Limited dynamic content
- Requires full rebuild for updates
graph LR
A[🛠️ Build Time] --> B[📂 Fetch Data]
B --> C[Generate Static Pages]
C --> D[Store on CDN]
D --> E[User Requests Page]
E --> F[Serve Pre-built Page]
Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR)
Process:
- Initial static generation
- Background revalidation
- Selective page updates
- Cached delivery
Advantages
- Dynamic content updates
- Fast initial loads
- Scalable architecture
- Reduced build times
Disadvantages
- Implementation complexity
- Potential stale content
- Cache management needed
graph LR
A[User Requests Page] --> B{Is Page Cached?}
B -- Yes --> C[Serve Cached Page]
B -- No --> D[Fetch Data from API]
D --> E[Generate Static Page]
E --> F[Cache the Page]
F --> C
📊 Rendering Methods Comparison
| Feature | CSR | SSR | SSG | ISR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Load | Slow | Fast | Fastest | Fast |
| SEO | Poor | Good | Excellent | Good |
| Dynamic Content | Excellent | Good | Poor | Good |
| Server Load | Low | High | Lowest | Medium |
| Build Time | N/A | N/A | Long | Medium |
Use Cases Table
Feature: CSR
- Use Case: SPA (Single Page Application), Dashboards
- Tools/Frameworks: React, Angular, Vue
- Security: Exposed API keys risk
Feature: SSR
- Use Case: News websites, e-commerce product pages
- Tools/Frameworks: Next.js, Nuxt.js
- Security: Better control over data flow
Feature: SSG
- Use Case: Blogs, Documentation sites
- Tools/Frameworks: Gatsby, Hugo, Jekyll
- Security: Safe with minimal server interaction
Feature: ISR
- Use Case: E-commerce product pages with frequent updates
- Tools/Frameworks: Next.js (ISR), Nuxt 3
- Security: Cache invalidation risks
Comments